调整待处理页任务优先体验(portal-task-first-redesign)
这个提交包含在:
@@ -257,6 +257,32 @@ and admin tools available without dominating the default path.
|
||||
asserting the task surface, primary action and secondary/advanced entry
|
||||
behavior.
|
||||
|
||||
### Convention: Approval Task List Defaults
|
||||
|
||||
**What**: PC approval task lists such as `/workflow/tasks` should make
|
||||
`查看处理` the default row action. List-level `通过` is only a secondary shortcut
|
||||
for low-risk items where the row itself carries enough decision context.
|
||||
|
||||
**Contracts**:
|
||||
|
||||
- The row must answer what the item is, who requested it, why it is assigned to
|
||||
the current user, how long it has waited, and the public business reference.
|
||||
- History entry text should be explicit, such as `已处理记录`; avoid user-facing
|
||||
`高级 / 历史` on the default task surface.
|
||||
- Time labels should prefer `已等待多久` and `接收于` over database-shaped labels
|
||||
such as `更新时间` when the source field is task creation/arrival time.
|
||||
- A quick `通过` button may appear only when the task is pending, the server
|
||||
allows `approve`, the item is a low-risk leave/attendance task, required row
|
||||
summary fields are present, and the task has not exceeded the pending window
|
||||
available to the frontend. Reimbursement, procurement, travel, contract and
|
||||
other amount/evidence-heavy tasks should route through `查看处理` first.
|
||||
- The confirm dialog for list quick approval must still explain action
|
||||
consequences and include the specific task summary.
|
||||
|
||||
**Why**: Small-team approvers need to clear work quickly without training
|
||||
themselves to approve financial or evidence-heavy items from an under-specified
|
||||
row.
|
||||
|
||||
## Convention: Workbench Onboarding And Profile Scope
|
||||
|
||||
**What**: PC workbench and account settings should stay task-first, not become
|
||||
|
||||
在新工单中引用
屏蔽一个用户