完善报销通知与付款进度（08-01-reimbursement-notification-progress-clarity）

.trellis/spec/hyb-oa/approval-workflow.md

@@ -138,9 +138,12 @@ if (!hasPermission(actor, "payment.batch.review")
   workflow stages use the actual pending assignee when available. Future stages
   keep `actorName=null`; never guess a person from today's role holders.
 - A reimbursement approved without a batch makes `payment_batch_review` the
-  current stage with `detail="待财务创建付款批次"`. A draft batch says
+  current stage with `detail="待财务安排付款"`. A draft batch says
-  `所在付款批次待非制单人复核`; shared-batch wording must not imply that this
+  `待非制单人复核付款`; employee-facing wording does not expose the internal
-  reimbursement alone is being reviewed again.
+  batch object or imply that this reimbursement alone is being reviewed again.
+- The final stage label is `付款完成`, and its pending/current/failed detail
+  explicitly says it is a finance registration step rather than an approval.
+  Internal finance pages may continue to use the precise `付款批次` term.
 - Missing workflow, batch or receipt facts degrade only their stages. Earlier
   known stages remain visible; missing downstream objects are normal, not 5xx.
 - `targetHref` is returned only when the viewer already has one of the existing
@@ -163,7 +166,7 @@ if (!hasPermission(actor, "payment.batch.review")
 - Batch `draft|reviewed|executed|failed|cancelled` -> map to explicit current,
   completed or exception states without changing the batch.
 - Executed payment + zero active receipts -> completed payment with
-  `付款已完成，回单待留存`; positive count -> `付款与回单已留存`.
+  `付款已完成，回单待留存`; positive count -> `付款和回单已留存`.
 - Viewer lacks batch-read permission -> `targetHref=null`; do not return 403 for
   the reimbursement detail itself.
 - Database/query failure -> existing 5xx behavior and server logging; do not
@@ -171,7 +174,7 @@ if (!hasPermission(actor, "payment.batch.review")
 
 ### 5. Good/Base/Bad Cases
 
-- Good: `财务复核=通过` followed by current `待财务创建付款批次`, so the owner
+- Good: `财务复核=通过` followed by current `待财务安排付款`, so the owner
   can diagnose the exact responsibility without asking three people.
 - Base: a newly submitted reimbursement shows known submission, every real
   configured approval task, and the two future payment stages with no guessed
@@ -210,3 +213,106 @@ const approvalStages = workflowTasks.map((task) => buildApprovalStage(task));
 approvalStages.push(...buildFutureSnapshotStages(workflowSnapshot, workflowTasks));
 return [submittedStage, ...approvalStages, batchReviewStage, paymentStage];
 ```
+
+## Scenario: Payment Responsibility Notifications
+
+### 1. Scope / Trigger
+
+- Trigger: creating a reimbursement payment batch, completing its maker-checker
+  review, or extending notifications to another payment responsibility handoff.
+- These are action-required notifications, not new workflow approval tasks and
+  not public business-domain events.
+
+### 2. Signatures
+
+- Notification types: `payment_batch.review_requested` and
+  `payment_batch.execution_requested`.
+- Both use `targetType=payment_batch`, `targetId=<batch id>` and
+  `targetPath=/payment-batches?id=<batch id>`.
+- Both resolve to the existing `reimbursement` IM domain while payment batches
+  contain only reimbursement entities.
+
+### 3. Contracts
+
+- Batch creation resolves active employees whose roles include `manager|ceo`
+  and whose effective role permissions include `payment.batch.review`; exclude
+  the maker and never hard-code a person's name or employee ID.
+- Review completion first targets the active maker when that employee still has
+  `payment.batch.manage`. If unavailable, fall back to other active
+  `finance|finance_mgr` employees with that permission; always exclude the
+  reviewer.
+- Create station notification records inside the same transaction as the batch
+  creation/review state change. Dispatch through the shared IM dispatcher only
+  after commit. A dispatch failure is logged and, once a channel attempt starts,
+  retained as delivery evidence; it never rolls back the committed payment
+  action.
+- Payment execution keeps the existing `reimbursement.paid` result notification
+  to the owner/submitter. `付款完成` remains a finance action and must not be
+  represented as another approval.
+- PC and mobile approval histories use the shared
+  `client/src/lib/approvalDisplay.ts#workflowActionLabel`; `start|submit` both
+  render as `提交`, and pages must not keep local label maps.
+
+### 4. Validation & Error Matrix
+
+- No eligible non-maker reviewer -> create the batch with zero review
+  notifications; do not weaken maker-checker or notify the maker.
+- Maker inactive or missing `payment.batch.manage` after review -> notify the
+  eligible finance fallback; no eligible fallback -> review remains committed
+  with zero execution notifications.
+- Maker attempts review or a reviewed batch is reviewed again -> existing
+  deterministic `409 VALID_001`; zero responsibility notifications and zero IM
+  dispatch.
+- IM disabled, recipient push disabled/unbound, or no matching channel -> station
+  notification remains; dispatcher returns a fixed skipped reason without
+  rolling back the payment action.
+- Notification record creation fails inside the transaction -> the protected
+  payment state change fails atomically; no partial handoff is reported.
+
+### 5. Good/Base/Bad Cases
+
+- Good: finance creates one weekly batch, the eligible non-maker reviewer gets
+  one notification, then successful review returns the action to the active
+  maker for payment and receipt registration.
+- Base: no eligible reviewer is configured; the draft batch remains visible for
+  diagnosis and no unqualified management broadcast is fabricated.
+- Bad: notify every finance/manager account, let the maker review their own
+  batch, send before transaction commit, or label payment completion as an
+  approval.
+
+### 6. Tests Required
+
+- Route tests assert qualified reviewer resolution, maker exclusion, active
+  maker preference, inactive-maker finance fallback and reviewer exclusion.
+- Negative tests assert maker conflict, repeated review and duplicate batch
+  creation produce no notification/dispatch.
+- Dispatcher tests assert both types are IM-supported and resolve to the
+  reimbursement domain; dispatch failure must leave the committed batch state.
+- PC/mobile E2E asserts `start` renders `提交` from the shared label map and the
+  five-stage employee projection ends with `付款复核` / `付款完成（非审批）`.
+
+### 7. Wrong vs Correct
+
+#### Wrong
+
+```js
+notifyEmployeesByRole(["manager", "finance"]);
+await tx.paymentBatch.update({ data: { status: "reviewed" } });
+```
+
+#### Correct
+
+```js
+const recipients = await resolvePaymentExecutionRecipientIds(tx, {
+  makerId: batch.created_by,
+  reviewerId: actor.id,
+});
+const notifications = await createNotificationsWithRecords(tx, {
+  recipientEmployeeIds: recipients,
+  type: NOTIFICATION_TYPES.paymentBatchExecutionRequested,
+  targetType: "payment_batch",
+  targetId: batch.id,
+});
+// after commit
+await flushNotificationDispatchTasks({ tasks: [buildDispatchTask(notifications)] });
+```

.trellis/tasks/08-01-reimbursement-notification-progress-clarity/check.jsonl

@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+{"_example": "Fill with {\"file\": \"<path>\", \"reason\": \"<why>\"}. Put spec/research files only — no code paths. Run `python3 .trellis/scripts/get_context.py --mode packages` to list available specs. Delete this line once real entries are added."}

.trellis/tasks/08-01-reimbursement-notification-progress-clarity/design.md

@@ -0,0 +1,56 @@
+# 报销通知与处理进度简化：设计
+
+## 1. 设计目标
+
+用最少改动恢复真实待办通知，并让员工看到职责清晰的报销全流程。工作流审批、付款批次和付款执行仍是三个独立状态源；页面只做汇总，不把它们合成一个状态机。
+
+## 2. 通知只读诊断
+
+按以下顺序诊断目标财务任务，任何一步都只记录布尔状态、计数、固定结果码和脱敏结论：
+
+1. 从目标报销的最新工作流实例定位主管已完成任务与当前财务任务，不保存内部 ID 到仓库证据。
+2. 以当前财务任务为 `target_id` 查询 `workflow.task_assigned` 站内通知，并确认收件人是否为预期财务人员。
+3. 若通知不存在，回到主管审批后的下一任务创建/收件人解析路径；若存在，继续查询 delivery 状态与固定 `result_code`。
+4. 只核对收件员工 active、`notification_push_enabled`、企微绑定是否存在，及启用渠道能否匹配 workflow 域和财务角色；不读取 userid、渠道 Secret、消息正文或响应原文。
+5. 只读结论不足以授权配置修改、补发、重启或生产写入，后续动作单独申请。
+
+## 3. 审批动作标签
+
+- `client/src/lib/approvalDisplay.ts` 的 `workflowActionLabel()` 为唯一共享映射。
+- PC `WorkflowTaskDetailPage.tsx` 和移动 `MobileApprovalsPage.tsx` 删除局部副本并导入共享函数。
+- 保持未知动作的原值兜底用于诊断，但所有当前受支持动作必须有中文映射；测试覆盖 `start` 与 `submit`。
+
+## 4. 员工进度表达
+
+- 后端处理进度阶段键保持兼容，只把普通详情的标签调整为“付款复核”“付款完成”。
+- `付款完成` 当前节点/待处理说明明确“由财务登记，非审批环节”；已完成时继续显示付款人、时间及回单是否留存。
+- “查看所在付款批次”只对已有批次读取权限的人显示，普通员工不接触内部批次对象名。
+- 五阶段继续使用一条竖向进度线，因为它表达全流程进展；文案区分审批与付款，不另加 Tab、折叠或第二张流程图。
+
+## 5. 付款阶段通知
+
+本节实施以第 2 节诊断结论为前置门：若原链路是投递配置问题，付款阶段只新增复用既有 dispatcher 的发送点；若原链路是通知创建或 side-effect flush 的代码问题，先修复并用既有主管→财务通知证明公共路径，再让两个付款发送点复用同一修复。禁止在根因未定时并行新增后再混合排障。
+
+### 5.1 批次创建后
+
+- 新建批次事务内创建“待付款复核”站内通知，事务提交后走现有 IM dispatcher。
+- 收件人由 active 员工的真实角色权限计算：必须有 `payment.batch.review` 且角色包含 `manager` 或 `ceo`，并排除批次创建人；不得写死姓名或向所有管理角色泛发。
+- 通知目标是 `payment_batch`，deeplink 进入现有付款页面的目标批次。
+
+### 5.2 批次复核后
+
+- 复核事务内创建“待执行付款”通知，收件人优先为仍 active 且具备 `payment.batch.manage` 的批次创建人；创建人不可用时，才解析其他具备管理权限的 active 财务人员，并排除当前复核人。
+- 不把付款动作通知给普通申请人；申请人在批次执行成功后继续收到既有 `reimbursement.paid`。
+
+### 5.3 合同与幂等
+
+- 新增明确的付款待办通知类型，不复用“报销已付款”或“工作流待审批”伪装语义。当前付款批次只开放报销实体，因此通知映射到既有 `reimbursement` domain，复用现有渠道配置；未来若重新开放其他实体付款，再按实体拆分 domain，不在本轮新建需要生产改配的 `payment` domain。
+- 通知创建与业务状态变更在同一事务内；投递失败不回滚已完成业务动作，但保留 delivery 失败证据。
+- 重复创建/复核请求由既有状态锁拒绝，测试证明不会产生重复通知。
+
+## 6. 兼容与回滚
+
+- 不修改数据库 schema、历史审批快照、既有通知记录或付款批次状态。
+- 文案改动可直接回滚；共享映射回滚不会影响服务端事实。
+- 付款通知若出现收件范围错误，关闭对应通知类型/代码路径即可，不撤销已经创建或复核的付款批次。
+- 本轮不合并财务复核与组批；累计 5–10 张真实单后的用户访谈是重新立项条件，不是当前发布门禁。

.trellis/tasks/08-01-reimbursement-notification-progress-clarity/implement.jsonl

@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+{"_example": "Fill with {\"file\": \"<path>\", \"reason\": \"<why>\"}. Put spec/research files only — no code paths. Run `python3 .trellis/scripts/get_context.py --mode packages` to list available specs. Delete this line once real entries are added."}

.trellis/tasks/08-01-reimbursement-notification-progress-clarity/implement.md

@@ -0,0 +1,49 @@
+# 报销通知与处理进度简化：实施计划
+
+## 0. 边界与前置
+
+- [x] 获得最终规划批准后再启动任务；生产只读诊断随本计划获批，任何生产写入、补发、配置修改或重启仍需另行批准。
+- [x] 不修改审批链、付款 maker-checker、数据库 schema、历史任务或真实付款数据。
+- [x] 生产诊断不输出通知正文、完整账号、企微 userid、内部业务 ID、Secret 或原始响应。
+
+## 1. 生产只读通知诊断
+
+- [x] 定位目标报销最新工作流的当前财务任务，先查 `workflow.task_assigned` 站内通知是否存在。
+- [x] 有通知则查 delivery 状态/固定结果码、推送开关、绑定存在性和渠道匹配；无通知则核对下一任务与收件人解析事实。
+- [x] 形成只含布尔值、计数和错误分类的结论；需要修生产配置、补发或重启时停止并申请批准。
+
+诊断结论（脱敏）：当前财务任务及对应站内通知均已生成，收件人 active、开启推送且存在企微绑定；投递尝试为 0，生产无启用且匹配的企微通知渠道。根因位于投递配置层，不是审批推进或通知创建代码。本任务没有修改生产配置、补发、重启或部署。
+
+## 2. 共享动作标签
+
+- [x] PC 与移动审批页移除局部 `workflowActionLabel`，统一导入共享实现。
+- [x] 增加 `start`/`submit` 中文映射回归，检查打印及其他调用方没有第三份重复映射。
+
+## 3. 处理进度文案
+
+- [x] 将员工详情的后两阶段改为“付款复核”“付款完成”。
+- [x] 付款完成待处理说明明确“由财务登记，非审批环节”，保留权限门控的批次入口和回单完成状态。
+- [x] 更新 PC/移动组件测试，断言五阶段顺序与普通员工不暴露内部批次入口。
+
+## 4. 付款责任人通知
+
+- [x] 以前述只读诊断结论为实施门：先证明公共通知创建/投递路径的根因与修复边界，再确定本节只新增发送点还是必须复用同一代码修复。
+- [x] 增加付款复核待办与付款执行待办的通知类型、domain 和脱敏文案。
+- [x] 批次创建事务内解析有复核权限的 active manager/ceo，排除创建人并创建通知；提交后复用现有 dispatcher。
+- [x] 批次复核事务内通知 active 批次创建人/实际付款责任人，排除复核人；付款执行成功沿用现有申请人通知。
+- [x] 覆盖无合格收件人、创建人停用、重复请求、投递失败不回滚业务和普通用户不可读批次等边界。
+
+## 5. 验证与审查
+
+- [x] 运行 workflow/reimbursement/payment-batch 聚焦 Vitest、付款并发与 maker-checker 回归。
+- [x] 运行客户端 typecheck/build、相关 PC/移动 Playwright 和动作标签单测。
+- [x] 运行 Prisma validate、task/governance/process/sensitive/diff 门禁。
+- [x] 因涉及 workflow/付款职责和通知收件范围，实施后执行只读 reviewer 检查，不允许 reviewer 改代码。
+- [ ] 部署与公网检查另行批准；未部署前不通知用户可以测试，企微实际到达必须真机确认。
+
+只读审查结论：首次检查发现站内通知中心缺少 `payment_batch` 目标链接，已补 PC/移动统一直达付款页并增加回归；复查未发现阻断项。通知记录与付款动作同事务，IM 投递发生在提交后且失败不回滚；复核人解析排除制单人，付款责任人解析排除复核人；重复创建/复核由既有锁和状态校验拒绝，不重复通知。生产仍无启用且匹配的企微渠道，属于已知部署后配置门，不得表述为企微通知已恢复。
+
+## 6. 运行观察
+
+- [x] 运行约定为每周集中建立一次付款批次，不建设排程功能。
+- [ ] 王芝玲累计处理 5–10 张真实报销后触发一次访谈，决定财务复核与加入批次是否值得另立合并任务（未来触发条件，当前尚未发生）。

.trellis/tasks/08-01-reimbursement-notification-progress-clarity/prd.md

@@ -0,0 +1,61 @@
+# 报销通知与处理进度简化
+
+## Goal
+
+让报销单在 5–10 人公司的真实流程中做到两件事：新的责任人能及时收到待办通知；申请人能看懂“审批”和“付款处理”的区别，不再把四个动作误认为四轮审批。
+
+## Background
+
+- 马建勇已在生产完成杨俊报销的主管审批，但下一节点王芝玲没有收到预期审批通知；王芝玲此前已通过企业微信登录，不能把问题归因于“从未登录”。
+- 代码在报销提交和工作流流转时会创建 `workflow.task_assigned`，主管通过后也会生成下一任务并排队通知，因此应先区分“站内通知未生成”和“已生成但企微未投递”。
+- 当前员工详情展示“付款批次复核”“付款与回单”，容易被理解为两轮额外审批；实际前者是非制单人付款复核，后者是财务线下付款后的回单与状态登记，不是审批。
+- 当前职责基线：马建勇负责主管审批和非制单付款复核；王芝玲负责财务复核、创建付款批次、线下付款、上传回单和登记付款完成。一个付款批次可以覆盖多张报销单。
+- `client/src/lib/approvalDisplay.ts` 已把 `start` 映射为“提交”，但 PC `WorkflowTaskDetailPage.tsx` 与移动 `MobileApprovalsPage.tsx` 各自复制了缺少 `start` 的局部映射，导致显示 `start · 杨俊`。
+
+## Scope
+
+- 先做一次获批的生产只读诊断：只核对目标工作流任务、王芝玲对应站内通知是否存在、投递记录状态/固定错误分类、通知开关、企微绑定状态和渠道匹配状态；不读取 Secret、消息正文或原始企微 payload。
+- 删除 PC/移动审批页重复的动作标签映射，统一使用共享 `workflowActionLabel()`；`start` 和 `submit` 均显示“提交”。
+- 员工报销进度保留五个业务阶段，但改为：申请提交、主管审批、财务复核、付款复核、付款完成；付款完成明确为“财务登记，非审批环节”。
+- 保留付款 maker-checker：付款批次创建人与复核人不得相同，当前只需一次非制单复核，不增加更多复核层级。
+- 通知以“新的责任人需要行动”为准：提交后通知主管、主管通过后通知财务、创建付款批次后通知非制单复核人、付款复核后通知财务/批次创建人继续付款、付款完成后通知申请人。
+- 每周集中建立一次付款批次作为当前运行约定，不在本任务建设定时排程、自动组批或强制付款日。
+
+## Requirements
+
+- 通知诊断必须先判断站内通知是否生成，再进入企微投递层，不能直接假设缺少通知代码或重复创建通知。
+- 若本次缺失由生产配置、人员推送开关、企微绑定或渠道配置造成，先给出脱敏根因和最小修复建议；任何生产写入、配置修改、补发消息或重启均需再次批准。
+- 新增付款阶段通知时必须复用现有通知、投递和审计服务；通知只给真实需要行动的人，不向所有 finance/manager 角色泛发重复消息。
+- 普通员工页面不突出“付款批次”内部对象名；有付款批次权限的人员仍可通过现有权限门控入口查看批次。
+- 共享动作标签是唯一事实源；PC、移动和打印页不得继续维护互相漂移的局部映射。
+- 不删除主管审批、财务复核或付款复核，不放宽自审，不把付款完成伪装成审批通过。
+
+## Acceptance Criteria
+
+- [ ] 脱敏证据能明确回答本次财务通知属于“未生成”还是“已生成未送达”，并定位到单一失败层或明确下一步，不包含通知正文、账号、Secret 或原始 payload。
+- [ ] 马建勇通过主管审批后，王芝玲能够收到对应的新待办站内通知；企微投递恢复需另有真实投递证据后才能标为通过。
+- [ ] PC 与移动审批处理历史均显示“提交 · 杨俊”，不再出现原始 `start`；动作标签映射只保留一个共享实现。
+- [ ] 普通报销详情依次显示“申请提交、主管审批、财务复核、付款复核、付款完成”，并明确付款完成不是审批。
+- [ ] 创建付款批次后通知实际可复核人员；复核通过后通知实际付款责任人；付款完成继续通知申请人，且同一事件不会重复创建/投递。
+- [ ] 付款复核仍强制非制单人且仅一轮；既有付款批次、审批快照和历史记录不迁移、不改写。
+- [ ] PC/移动相关组件测试、通知路由/服务测试、付款 maker-checker 回归、前端 typecheck/build 与 Trellis 门禁通过。
+
+## Out of Scope
+
+- 不在本任务删除付款批次、付款复核或银行回单要求。
+- 不接银行接口，不让 OA 自动执行真实付款。
+- 不建设每周付款日排程、自动组批、批次自动复核或定时通知。
+- 不在未获批准时修改生产通知渠道、员工推送开关、企微绑定、环境变量或服务状态。
+- 不顺带重构全部审批页面或统一所有业务状态标签。
+
+## Deferred Decision With Trigger
+
+- 本轮不合并“财务复核通过”和“加入/创建本周付款批次”。决定性依据是王芝玲尚未实际执行过财务复核，无法判断她会随到随审还是与周付款批次一起处理；提前合并可能迫使她延迟复核或频繁建批次。
+- 触发条件：王芝玲累计处理 5–10 张真实报销单后，由负责人直接询问“财务复核与加入付款批次通常一次完成，还是分开完成？”若一次完成，再立小任务评估合并；若随到随审、定期组批，则永久保持两个动作分离。
+
+## Test Plan
+
+- 聚焦测试动作标签、下一审批任务通知、付款批次创建/复核/执行通知和幂等性。
+- 运行相关 server Vitest、付款并发/maker-checker 回归、客户端 typecheck/build 与相关 Playwright。
+- 运行 task validate、Trellis governance、process contract、sensitive-content scan 与 `git diff --check`。
+- 生产只读诊断和任何后续真机通知验证分开记录；没有实际企微到达证据时不得宣称通知已恢复。

.trellis/tasks/08-01-reimbursement-notification-progress-clarity/task.json

@@ -0,0 +1,26 @@
+{
+  "id": "reimbursement-notification-progress-clarity",
+  "name": "reimbursement-notification-progress-clarity",
+  "title": "报销通知与处理进度简化",
+  "description": "诊断报销审批通知投递，统一审批动作中文映射，并按小团队实际职责简化付款阶段展示。",
+  "status": "in_progress",
+  "dev_type": null,
+  "scope": "报销审批通知只读诊断、审批动作标签去重、付款阶段文案与必要通知；不削弱付款 maker-checker",
+  "package": null,
+  "priority": "P2",
+  "creator": "shunli",
+  "assignee": "shunli",
+  "createdAt": "2026-08-01",
+  "completedAt": null,
+  "branch": null,
+  "base_branch": "main",
+  "worktree_path": null,
+  "commit": null,
+  "pr_url": null,
+  "subtasks": [],
+  "children": [],
+  "parent": null,
+  "relatedFiles": [],
+  "notes": "",
+  "meta": {}
+}

client/src/lib/notificationLinks.ts

@@ -18,6 +18,10 @@ export function resolveNotificationTargetLink(item: NotificationTarget) {
     return `/reimbursements/${item.targetId}`;
   }
 
+  if (item.targetType === "payment_batch") {
+    return `/payment-batches?id=${encodeSegment(item.targetId)}`;
+  }
+
   if (item.targetType === "leave_request") {
     return `/leave-requests?highlight=${item.targetId}`;
   }
@@ -60,6 +64,10 @@ export function resolveMobileNotificationTargetLink(item: NotificationTarget) {
     return `/mobile/reimbursements/${encodeSegment(item.targetId)}`;
   }
 
+  if (item.targetType === "payment_batch") {
+    return `/payment-batches?id=${encodeSegment(item.targetId)}`;
+  }
+
   if (item.targetType === "leave_request") {
     return `/mobile/leave/${encodeSegment(item.targetId)}`;
   }

client/src/pages/MobileApprovalsPage.tsx

@@ -31,7 +31,7 @@ import { Spinner } from "../components/ui/spinner";
 import { Tabs, TabsList, TabsTrigger } from "../components/ui/tabs";
 import { Textarea } from "../components/ui/textarea";
 import { MOBILE_APPROVAL_PERMISSIONS } from "../features/mobile/navigation";
-import { resolvePurchaseDisplayCode } from "../lib/approvalDisplay";
+import { resolvePurchaseDisplayCode, workflowActionLabel } from "../lib/approvalDisplay";
 import { businessPrimaryLabel, compactBusinessReference, joinBusinessMeta } from "../lib/businessDisplay";
 import { resolveReimbursementDisplayCode } from "../lib/reimbursementDisplay";
 import { cn } from "../lib/utils";
@@ -150,27 +150,6 @@ function workflowStatusLabel(status: string) {
   return status;
 }
 
-function workflowActionLabel(action: string | null | undefined) {
-  if (!action) {
-    return "-";
-  }
-
-  const labels: Record<string, string> = {
-    submit: "提交",
-    approve: "通过",
-    reject: "驳回",
-    return: "退回",
-    transfer: "转审",
-    withdraw: "撤回",
-    remind: "催办",
-    overdue_remind: "超时提醒",
-    cancel: "取消",
-    skip: "跳过",
-  };
-
-  return labels[action] ?? action;
-}
-
 function businessStatusLabel(status: string | null | undefined) {
   const labels: Record<string, string> = {
     draft: "草稿",

client/src/pages/MobileNotificationsPage.tsx

@@ -17,7 +17,7 @@ const PAGE_SIZE = 20;
 const NOTIFICATION_TYPE_OPTIONS = [
   { label: "全部", value: "" },
   { label: "审批事件", value: "workflow.task_assigned,workflow.task_reminded,workflow.task_overdue" },
-  { label: "报销", value: "reimbursement.approved,reimbursement.rejected,reimbursement.returned,reimbursement.paid" },
+  { label: "报销", value: "reimbursement.approved,reimbursement.rejected,reimbursement.returned,reimbursement.paid,payment_batch.review_requested,payment_batch.execution_requested" },
   { label: "请假", value: "leave.approved,leave.rejected" },
   { label: "采购", value: "purchase_request.approved,purchase_request.rejected" },
   { label: "差旅", value: "travel_request.approved,travel_request.rejected" },
@@ -39,6 +39,7 @@ function formatTime(value: string) {
 function notificationTypeLabel(type: string) {
   if (type.startsWith("workflow.")) return "审批事件";
   if (type.startsWith("reimbursement.")) return "报销事件";
+  if (type.startsWith("payment_batch.")) return "付款事件";
   if (type.startsWith("leave.")) return "请假事件";
   if (type.startsWith("purchase_request.")) return "采购事件";
   if (type.startsWith("travel_request.")) return "差旅事件";

client/src/pages/NotificationsPage.tsx

@@ -17,7 +17,7 @@ const PAGE_SIZE = 20;
 const NOTIFICATION_TYPE_OPTIONS = [
   { label: "全部", value: "" },
   { label: "审批提醒", value: "workflow.task_assigned" },
-  { label: "报销", value: "reimbursement.approved,reimbursement.rejected,reimbursement.returned,reimbursement.paid" },
+  { label: "报销", value: "reimbursement.approved,reimbursement.rejected,reimbursement.returned,reimbursement.paid,payment_batch.review_requested,payment_batch.execution_requested" },
   { label: "请假", value: "leave.approved,leave.rejected" },
   { label: "采购", value: "purchase_request.approved,purchase_request.rejected" },
   { label: "差旅", value: "travel_request.approved,travel_request.rejected" },

client/src/pages/WorkflowTaskDetailPage.tsx

@@ -32,7 +32,7 @@ import { PageScaffold } from "../components/patterns/PageScaffold";
 import { SectionPanel } from "../components/patterns/SectionPanel";
 import { Button } from "../components/ui/button";
 import { Textarea } from "../components/ui/textarea";
-import { resolvePurchaseDisplayCode } from "../lib/approvalDisplay";
+import { resolvePurchaseDisplayCode, workflowActionLabel } from "../lib/approvalDisplay";
 import { formatDisplayDateTime } from "../lib/displayFormat";
 import {
   buildPcDetailSource,
@@ -85,27 +85,6 @@ function workflowInstanceStatusLabel(status: string | undefined | null) {
   return labels[status] ?? status;
 }
 
-function workflowActionLabel(action: string | undefined | null) {
-  if (!action) {
-    return "-";
-  }
-
-  const labels: Record<string, string> = {
-    submit: "提交",
-    approve: "通过",
-    reject: "驳回",
-    return: "退回",
-    transfer: "转审",
-    withdraw: "撤回",
-    remind: "催办",
-    overdue_remind: "超时提醒",
-    cancel: "取消",
-    skip: "跳过",
-  };
-
-  return labels[action] ?? action;
-}
-
 function DetailField({ label, value }: { label: string; value: ReactNode }) {
   return (
     <div className="detail-fact-card">

client/tests/e2e/dg7-mobile-information-dedupe.spec.ts

@@ -1,6 +1,10 @@
 import { mkdirSync } from "node:fs";
 import path from "node:path";
 import { expect, test, type Browser, type Page, type Route } from "@playwright/test";
+import {
+  resolveMobileNotificationTargetLink,
+  resolveNotificationTargetLink,
+} from "../../src/lib/notificationLinks";
 
 const ROOT_DIR = path.resolve(process.cwd(), "..");
 const SCREENSHOT_DIR = path.join(ROOT_DIR, "output/playwright/mobile-ia-flow-remediation");
@@ -881,6 +885,13 @@ async function expectCommonActionsDoNotDuplicateBottomTabs(page: Page) {
 }
 
 test.describe("MIF7 移动信息架构整改", () => {
+  test("付款责任通知在 PC 与移动通知中心都可直达付款批次", () => {
+    const target = { targetType: "payment_batch", targetId: "batch/dg7" };
+
+    expect(resolveNotificationTargetLink(target)).toBe("/payment-batches?id=batch%2Fdg7");
+    expect(resolveMobileNotificationTargetLink(target)).toBe("/payment-batches?id=batch%2Fdg7");
+  });
+
   test.skip(process.env.E2E_MODE === "live", "MIF7 本地专项使用 mock 数据验证信息架构。");
 
   test("首页常用入口不重复底部 Tab，员工进度页按状态分标签", async ({ browser }) => {
@@ -1108,7 +1119,7 @@ test.describe("MIF7 移动信息架构整改", () => {
         [
           "mobile-reimbursement-items",
           "mobile-reimbursement-attachments",
-          "mobile-reimbursement-approval-history",
+          "mobile-reimbursement-processing-progress",
         ].map((testId) => document.querySelector(`[data-testid='${testId}']`)?.getBoundingClientRect().top ?? -1),
       );
       expect(sectionOrder[0]).toBeLessThan(sectionOrder[1]);

client/tests/e2e/pc-detail-mobile-visual-wave3.spec.ts

@@ -155,8 +155,8 @@ const reimbursementDetail = {
       { key: "manager_approval", label: "主管审批", state: "current", actorName: visualMe.name, occurredAt: "2026-05-27T09:00:00.000Z", result: "处理中", comment: null, detail: "待主管审批处理", targetHref: null },
       { key: "approval_extra-review", label: "负责人复核", state: "pending", actorName: null, occurredAt: null, result: null, comment: null, detail: "待处理", targetHref: null },
       { key: "finance_review", label: "财务复核", state: "pending", actorName: null, occurredAt: null, result: null, comment: null, detail: "待处理", targetHref: null },
-      { key: "payment_batch_review", label: "付款批次复核", state: "pending", actorName: null, occurredAt: null, result: null, comment: null, detail: "待财务创建付款批次", targetHref: null },
+      { key: "payment_batch_review", label: "付款复核", state: "pending", actorName: null, occurredAt: null, result: null, comment: null, detail: "待财务安排付款", targetHref: null },
-      { key: "payment_and_receipt", label: "付款与回单", state: "pending", actorName: null, occurredAt: null, result: null, comment: null, detail: "待付款批次复核后处理", targetHref: null },
+      { key: "payment_and_receipt", label: "付款完成", state: "pending", actorName: null, occurredAt: null, result: null, comment: null, detail: "待付款复核后由财务登记，非审批环节", targetHref: null },
     ],
   },
   approvalHistory: [
@@ -1101,11 +1101,12 @@ test("报销详情固定使用上海时区并收敛只读信息", async ({ page
   await expect(page.getByTestId("reimbursement-materials").getByRole("button", { name: /查看补充附件/ })).toHaveCount(1);
   await expect(page.getByTestId("reimbursement-materials").getByRole("button", { name: /移除|删除/ })).toHaveCount(0);
   await expect(page.getByTestId("reimbursement-workflow-progress")).toContainText("负责人复核");
-  await expect(page.getByTestId("reimbursement-workflow-progress")).toContainText("付款批次复核");
+  await expect(page.getByTestId("reimbursement-workflow-progress")).toContainText("付款复核");
   await expect(page.getByTestId("reimbursement-workflow-progress")).not.toContainText(/第 \d+ 步/);
 
   await page.goto("/workflow/tasks/task-wave3");
   await expect(page.getByTestId("workflow-task-overview")).toContainText("2026年5月27日 17:05");
+  await expect(page.getByText(`提交 · ${visualMe.name}`)).toBeVisible();
 
   await page.setViewportSize({ width: 390, height: 844 });
   await page.goto("/mobile/reimbursements/reim-wave3");
@@ -1119,7 +1120,7 @@ test("报销详情固定使用上海时区并收敛只读信息", async ({ page
   await expect(page.getByTestId("mobile-reimbursement-materials").getByRole("button", { name: /查看发票原件/ })).toHaveCount(1);
   await expect(page.getByTestId("mobile-reimbursement-materials").getByRole("button", { name: /查看补充附件/ })).toHaveCount(1);
   await expect(page.getByTestId("mobile-reimbursement-materials").getByRole("button", { name: /移除|删除/ })).toHaveCount(0);
-  await expect(page.getByTestId("mobile-reimbursement-processing-progress")).toContainText("付款与回单");
+  await expect(page.getByTestId("mobile-reimbursement-processing-progress")).toContainText("付款完成");
   await expect(page.getByTestId("mobile-reimbursement-actions")).toHaveCount(0);
   await expect(page.getByText("PDF/JPG/PNG/WebP，单次最多 5 个")).toHaveCount(0);
   await expectNoHorizontalOverflow(page);

client/tests/e2e/r111-invoice-reimbursement-guard.spec.ts

@@ -203,8 +203,8 @@ function buildReimbursementDetail(state: ReturnType<typeof buildReimbursementSta
         { key: "submitted", label: "申请提交", state: "current", actorName: "测试员工", occurredAt: null, result: "待提交", comment: null, detail: "待申请人提交", targetHref: null },
         { key: "manager_approval", label: "主管审批", state: "pending", actorName: null, occurredAt: null, result: null, comment: null, detail: "待处理", targetHref: null },
         { key: "finance_review", label: "财务复核", state: "pending", actorName: null, occurredAt: null, result: null, comment: null, detail: "待处理", targetHref: null },
-        { key: "payment_batch_review", label: "付款批次复核", state: "pending", actorName: null, occurredAt: null, result: null, comment: null, detail: "待财务创建付款批次", targetHref: null },
+        { key: "payment_batch_review", label: "付款复核", state: "pending", actorName: null, occurredAt: null, result: null, comment: null, detail: "待财务安排付款", targetHref: null },
-        { key: "payment_and_receipt", label: "付款与回单", state: "pending", actorName: null, occurredAt: null, result: null, comment: null, detail: "待付款批次复核后处理", targetHref: null },
+        { key: "payment_and_receipt", label: "付款完成", state: "pending", actorName: null, occurredAt: null, result: null, comment: null, detail: "待付款复核后由财务登记，非审批环节", targetHref: null },
       ],
     },
     approvalHistory: [],

client/tests/e2e/reimbursement-workflow-progress.spec.ts

@@ -71,8 +71,9 @@ test("E2E 报销处理进度：提交后按真实 workflow 展示职责进度",
     await expect(reimbursementDetail.workflowProgress).toContainText("申请提交");
     await expect(reimbursementDetail.workflowProgress).toContainText("审批");
     await expect(reimbursementDetail.workflowProgress).not.toContainText("审批节点1");
-    await expect(reimbursementDetail.workflowProgress).toContainText("付款批次复核");
+    await expect(reimbursementDetail.workflowProgress).toContainText("付款复核");
-    await expect(reimbursementDetail.workflowProgress).toContainText("付款与回单");
+    await expect(reimbursementDetail.workflowProgress).toContainText("付款完成");
+    await expect(reimbursementDetail.workflowProgress).toContainText("非审批环节");
     await expect(reimbursementDetail.workflowProgress).not.toContainText(/第 \d+ 步/);
 
     await logout(page, EMPLOYEE.name);

docs/领域事件清单.md

@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
 # 领域事件清单（P19 / P19+IM-1 / P19+ERP-3 / P19+AI-1 / P20+TRAVEL-1 / P20+TRAVEL-2 / P20+TRAVEL-3）
 
 **文档状态**：技术参考和历史证据，不是当前 MVP 需求事实源。
-**快照日期**：2026-03-10
+**快照日期**：2026-08-01
 **目标**：冻结 `hyb-oa` 当前采购、资产与差旅域的标准领域事件名，并补充 `P19+IM-1` 已实际消费的 IM 通知类型清单，以及 `P19+ERP-1 / ERP-3 / AI-1 / TRAVEL-1` 已实际落地的消费映射，作为后续 ERP / IM / AI / TRAVEL 适配的事实源。
 **不得误读**：本文用于追溯 Outbox、IM、ERP、AI、TRAVEL 等历史集成边界；当前 10 人以下公司 MVP 范围以 [海音达OA-MVP需求规格说明书](./海音达OA-MVP需求规格说明书.md)、模块规约和最新 `issues/*.csv` 为准。
 
@@ -85,6 +85,8 @@
 | `reimbursement.rejected` | 报销驳回 | `reimbursement_form` | `/reimbursements/:id` | 结果通知 |
 | `reimbursement.returned` | 报销退回 | `reimbursement_form` | `/reimbursements/:id` | 结果通知 |
 | `reimbursement.paid` | 报销付款完成 | `reimbursement_form` | `/reimbursements/:id` | 财务结果通知 |
+| `payment_batch.review_requested` | 报销付款批次创建，责任转给非制单复核人 | `payment_batch` | `/payment-batches?id=<id>` | 待办通知；复用 `reimbursement` 通知域 |
+| `payment_batch.execution_requested` | 付款复核通过，责任转回实际付款人 | `payment_batch` | `/payment-batches?id=<id>` | 待办通知；优先通知仍可付款的制单人 |
 | `leave.approved` | 请假审批通过 | `leave_request` | `/leave-requests` | 结果通知 |
 | `leave.rejected` | 请假驳回 | `leave_request` | `/leave-requests` | 结果通知 |
 | `purchase_request.approved` | 采购审批通过 | `purchase_request` | `/purchase-requests` | 结果通知 |

server/src/constants/notificationTypes.js

@@ -17,6 +17,8 @@ const NOTIFICATION_TYPES = Object.freeze({
   reimbursementRejected: 'reimbursement.rejected',
   reimbursementReturned: 'reimbursement.returned',
   reimbursementPaid: 'reimbursement.paid',
+  paymentBatchReviewRequested: 'payment_batch.review_requested',
+  paymentBatchExecutionRequested: 'payment_batch.execution_requested',
   leaveApproved: 'leave.approved',
   leaveRejected: 'leave.rejected',
   attendanceCorrectionApproved: 'attendance_correction.approved',
@@ -39,6 +41,8 @@ const IM_SUPPORTED_NOTIFICATION_TYPES = Object.freeze([
   NOTIFICATION_TYPES.reimbursementRejected,
   NOTIFICATION_TYPES.reimbursementReturned,
   NOTIFICATION_TYPES.reimbursementPaid,
+  NOTIFICATION_TYPES.paymentBatchReviewRequested,
+  NOTIFICATION_TYPES.paymentBatchExecutionRequested,
   NOTIFICATION_TYPES.leaveApproved,
   NOTIFICATION_TYPES.leaveRejected,
   NOTIFICATION_TYPES.attendanceCorrectionApproved,
@@ -61,6 +65,8 @@ const NOTIFICATION_TYPE_TO_DOMAIN_SCOPE = Object.freeze({
   [NOTIFICATION_TYPES.reimbursementRejected]: NOTIFICATION_DOMAIN_SCOPES.reimbursement,
   [NOTIFICATION_TYPES.reimbursementReturned]: NOTIFICATION_DOMAIN_SCOPES.reimbursement,
   [NOTIFICATION_TYPES.reimbursementPaid]: NOTIFICATION_DOMAIN_SCOPES.reimbursement,
+  [NOTIFICATION_TYPES.paymentBatchReviewRequested]: NOTIFICATION_DOMAIN_SCOPES.reimbursement,
+  [NOTIFICATION_TYPES.paymentBatchExecutionRequested]: NOTIFICATION_DOMAIN_SCOPES.reimbursement,
   [NOTIFICATION_TYPES.leaveApproved]: NOTIFICATION_DOMAIN_SCOPES.leave,
   [NOTIFICATION_TYPES.leaveRejected]: NOTIFICATION_DOMAIN_SCOPES.leave,
   [NOTIFICATION_TYPES.attendanceCorrectionApproved]: NOTIFICATION_DOMAIN_SCOPES.attendance,

server/src/routes/paymentBatches.js

@@ -11,6 +11,7 @@ const { parseDateOnlyString } = require("../utils/date");
 const { FEATURE_FLAG_KEYS, evaluateFeatureFlag } = require("../services/featureFlags");
 const { createNotificationsWithRecords } = require("../services/notifications");
 const { NOTIFICATION_TYPES } = require("../constants/notificationTypes");
+const { resolvePermissionsForRoles, hasPermission } = require("../constants/permissions");
 const { sendNotificationEmailSafe } = require("../services/email");
 const { flushNotificationDispatchTasks } = require("../services/notificationDispatcher");
 const { enqueueReimbursementJournalExport } = require("../services/integrations/erpJournal");
@@ -247,6 +248,118 @@ function ensureBatchReviewPermission(fastify, request) {
   }
 }
 
+function roleCodesOf(employee) {
+  return (employee?.roles ?? []).map((role) => role.role_code).filter(Boolean);
+}
+
+function employeeHasRolePermission(employee, permissionCode) {
+  return hasPermission(resolvePermissionsForRoles(roleCodesOf(employee)), permissionCode);
+}
+
+async function resolvePaymentReviewRecipientIds(tx, makerId) {
+  const candidates = await tx.employee.findMany({
+    where: {
+      status: "active",
+      id: { not: makerId },
+      roles: { some: { role_code: { in: ["manager", "ceo"] } } },
+    },
+    orderBy: [{ employee_no: "asc" }, { id: "asc" }],
+    select: {
+      id: true,
+      roles: { select: { role_code: true } },
+    },
+  });
+
+  return candidates
+    .filter((employee) => employeeHasRolePermission(employee, "payment.batch.review"))
+    .map((employee) => employee.id);
+}
+
+async function resolvePaymentExecutionRecipientIds(tx, { makerId, reviewerId }) {
+  const candidates = await tx.employee.findMany({
+    where: {
+      status: "active",
+      id: { not: reviewerId },
+      OR: [
+        { id: makerId },
+        { roles: { some: { role_code: { in: ["finance", "finance_mgr"] } } } },
+      ],
+    },
+    orderBy: [{ employee_no: "asc" }, { id: "asc" }],
+    select: {
+      id: true,
+      roles: { select: { role_code: true } },
+    },
+  });
+  const eligible = candidates.filter((employee) =>
+    employee.id !== reviewerId && employeeHasRolePermission(employee, "payment.batch.manage"),
+  );
+  const activeMaker = eligible.find((employee) => employee.id === makerId);
+  if (activeMaker) {
+    return [activeMaker.id];
+  }
+
+  return eligible
+    .filter((employee) => roleCodesOf(employee).some((roleCode) => ["finance", "finance_mgr"].includes(roleCode)))
+    .map((employee) => employee.id);
+}
+
+async function createPaymentResponsibilityNotification(tx, {
+  recipientEmployeeIds,
+  type,
+  title,
+  body,
+  batchId,
+  actorId,
+}) {
+  const notifications = await createNotificationsWithRecords(tx, {
+    recipientEmployeeIds,
+    type,
+    title,
+    body,
+    targetType: "payment_batch",
+    targetId: batchId,
+  });
+
+  return {
+    notifications,
+    type,
+    title,
+    body,
+    targetType: "payment_batch",
+    targetId: batchId,
+    targetPath: `/payment-batches?id=${encodeURIComponent(batchId)}`,
+    actorId,
+  };
+}
+
+async function dispatchPaymentResponsibilityNotification(fastify, request, task) {
+  if (!task?.notifications?.length) {
+    return;
+  }
+
+  try {
+    await flushNotificationDispatchTasks({
+      prisma: fastify.prisma,
+      config: fastify.config,
+      logger: fastify.log,
+      requestId: request.id,
+      tasks: [task],
+    });
+  } catch (error) {
+    fastify.log.error(
+      {
+        err: error,
+        requestId: request.id,
+        notificationType: task.type,
+        targetType: task.targetType,
+        targetId: task.targetId,
+      },
+      "Failed to dispatch payment responsibility notification",
+    );
+  }
+}
+
 function buildBatchNo() {
   const now = new Date();
   const date = now.toISOString().slice(0, 10).replace(/-/g, "");
@@ -1057,7 +1170,7 @@ async function paymentBatchesRoutes(fastify) {
     }
     const entityIds = Array.from(new Set(body.entityIds)).sort();
 
-    const created = await fastify.prisma.$transaction(async (tx) => {
+    const { batch: created, notificationTask } = await fastify.prisma.$transaction(async (tx) => {
       await lockPaymentEntities(tx, body.entityType, entityIds);
       const snapshots = await loadEntitySnapshots(tx, body.entityType, entityIds);
       if (snapshots.length !== entityIds.length) {
@@ -1130,9 +1243,24 @@ async function paymentBatchesRoutes(fastify) {
         }),
       });
 
-      return loadBatchWithItems(tx, batch.id);
+      const recipientEmployeeIds = await resolvePaymentReviewRecipientIds(tx, request.employee.id);
+      const nextNotificationTask = await createPaymentResponsibilityNotification(tx, {
+        recipientEmployeeIds,
+        type: NOTIFICATION_TYPES.paymentBatchReviewRequested,
+        title: "待付款复核",
+        body: "付款安排已创建，请完成付款复核。",
+        batchId: batch.id,
+        actorId: request.employee.id,
+      });
+
+      return {
+        batch: await loadBatchWithItems(tx, batch.id),
+        notificationTask: nextNotificationTask,
+      };
     });
 
+    await dispatchPaymentResponsibilityNotification(fastify, request, notificationTask);
+
     return reply.code(201).send({ requestId: request.id, data: { item: mapBatch(created, []) } });
   });
 
@@ -1590,7 +1718,7 @@ async function paymentBatchesRoutes(fastify) {
     const batchId = parseId(request.params?.id);
     const body = parseBody(REVIEW_SCHEMA, request.body);
 
-    const result = await fastify.prisma.$transaction(async (tx) => {
+    const { batch: result, notificationTask } = await fastify.prisma.$transaction(async (tx) => {
       const batch = await lockBatchWithItems(tx, batchId);
       await ensureBatchSourceDepartmentsEnabled(fastify, tx, batch);
       const batchRisk = summarizeBatchRisk(batch);
@@ -1659,9 +1787,27 @@ async function paymentBatchesRoutes(fastify) {
         }),
       });
 
-      return reviewed;
+      const recipientEmployeeIds = await resolvePaymentExecutionRecipientIds(tx, {
+        makerId: batch.created_by,
+        reviewerId: request.employee.id,
+      });
+      const nextNotificationTask = await createPaymentResponsibilityNotification(tx, {
+        recipientEmployeeIds,
+        type: NOTIFICATION_TYPES.paymentBatchExecutionRequested,
+        title: "待完成付款",
+        body: "付款复核已通过，请完成付款并登记回单。",
+        batchId,
+        actorId: request.employee.id,
+      });
+
+      return {
+        batch: reviewed,
+        notificationTask: nextNotificationTask,
+      };
     });
 
+    await dispatchPaymentResponsibilityNotification(fastify, request, notificationTask);
+
     return sendData(reply, request, { item: mapBatch(result, []) });
   });
 

server/src/routes/reimbursements.js

@@ -333,8 +333,8 @@ const PROCESSING_STAGE_DEFINITIONS = Object.freeze([
   { key: "submitted", label: "申请提交" },
   { key: "manager_approval", label: "主管审批" },
   { key: "finance_review", label: "财务复核" },
-  { key: "payment_batch_review", label: "付款批次复核" },
+  { key: "payment_batch_review", label: "付款复核" },
-  { key: "payment_and_receipt", label: "付款与回单" },
+  { key: "payment_and_receipt", label: "付款完成" },
 ]);
 
 function isoDateTimeOrNull(value) {
@@ -511,31 +511,34 @@ function buildProcessingProgress({ reimbursement, workflowInstance, paymentBatch
 
   if (!batch) {
     Object.assign(batchReviewStage, reimbursement.status === "approved"
-      ? { state: "current", result: "待建批次", detail: "待财务创建付款批次" }
+      ? { state: "current", result: "待安排", detail: "待财务安排付款" }
-      : { detail: "待财务创建付款批次" });
+      : { detail: "待财务安排付款" });
-    paymentStage.detail = "待付款批次复核后处理";
+    paymentStage.detail = "待付款复核后由财务登记，非审批环节";
   } else if (batch.status === "draft") {
     Object.assign(batchReviewStage, {
       state: "current",
       result: "待复核",
-      detail: "所在付款批次待非制单人复核",
+      detail: "待非制单人复核付款",
+      targetHref: batchTargetHref,
+    });
+    Object.assign(paymentStage, {
+      detail: "待付款复核通过后由财务登记，非审批环节",
       targetHref: batchTargetHref,
     });
-    Object.assign(paymentStage, { detail: "待所在付款批次复核通过", targetHref: batchTargetHref });
   } else if (["reviewed", "executed", "failed"].includes(batch.status)) {
     Object.assign(batchReviewStage, {
       state: "completed",
       actorName: paymentActorNames.get(batch.reviewed_by) ?? null,
       occurredAt: isoDateTimeOrNull(batch.reviewed_at),
       result: "通过",
-      detail: batch.status === "reviewed" ? "所在付款批次已复核，待执行付款" : null,
+      detail: batch.status === "reviewed" ? "付款复核已通过" : null,
       targetHref: batchTargetHref,
     });
     if (batch.status === "reviewed") {
       Object.assign(paymentStage, {
         state: "current",
         result: "待付款",
-        detail: "所在付款批次已复核，待执行付款",
+        detail: "待财务完成付款并登记回单，非审批环节",
         targetHref: batchTargetHref,
       });
     } else if (batch.status === "failed") {
@@ -544,7 +547,7 @@ function buildProcessingProgress({ reimbursement, workflowInstance, paymentBatch
         actorName: paymentActorNames.get(batch.executed_by) ?? null,
         occurredAt: isoDateTimeOrNull(batch.executed_at),
         result: "付款失败",
-        detail: "所在付款批次执行失败，待财务重新处理",
+        detail: "付款失败，待财务重新处理，非审批环节",
         targetHref: batchTargetHref,
       });
     }
@@ -555,11 +558,11 @@ function buildProcessingProgress({ reimbursement, workflowInstance, paymentBatch
       occurredAt: isoDateTimeOrNull(batch.cancelled_at),
       result: "批次已取消",
       comment: batch.cancelled_reason ?? null,
-      detail: "所在付款批次已取消，待财务重新创建",
+      detail: "付款安排已取消，待财务重新处理",
       targetHref: batchTargetHref,
     });
     Object.assign(paymentStage, {
-      detail: "待财务重新创建付款批次",
+      detail: "待财务重新安排付款，非审批环节",
       targetHref: batchTargetHref,
     });
   }
@@ -571,7 +574,7 @@ function buildProcessingProgress({ reimbursement, workflowInstance, paymentBatch
       actorName: reimbursement.paid_by_employee?.name ?? paymentActorNames.get(batch?.executed_by) ?? null,
       occurredAt: isoDateTimeOrNull(reimbursement.paid_at ?? batch?.executed_at),
       result: "已付款",
-      detail: receiptCount > 0 ? "付款与回单已留存" : "付款已完成，回单待留存",
+      detail: receiptCount > 0 ? "付款和回单已留存" : "付款已完成，回单待留存",
       targetHref: batchTargetHref,
     });
   }

server/tests/unit/constants/notificationTypes.test.js

@@ -20,4 +20,21 @@ describe("notification types", () => {
       NOTIFICATION_DOMAIN_SCOPES.workflow,
     );
   });
+
+  it("routes payment responsibility notifications through the reimbursement IM domain", () => {
+    expect(IM_SUPPORTED_NOTIFICATION_TYPES).toEqual(
+      expect.arrayContaining([
+        NOTIFICATION_TYPES.paymentBatchReviewRequested,
+        NOTIFICATION_TYPES.paymentBatchExecutionRequested,
+      ]),
+    );
+    expect(resolveNotificationDomainScope(
+      NOTIFICATION_TYPES.paymentBatchReviewRequested,
+      "payment_batch",
+    )).toBe(NOTIFICATION_DOMAIN_SCOPES.reimbursement);
+    expect(resolveNotificationDomainScope(
+      NOTIFICATION_TYPES.paymentBatchExecutionRequested,
+      "payment_batch",
+    )).toBe(NOTIFICATION_DOMAIN_SCOPES.reimbursement);
+  });
 });

server/tests/unit/routes/paymentBatches.reimbursement.test.js

@@ -211,6 +211,10 @@ function buildPrisma(options = {}) {
     },
     receiptAttachments: options.receiptAttachments ?? defaultReceiptAttachments,
     reservedEntityIds: options.reservedEntityIds ?? [],
+    employees: options.employees ?? [
+      { id: MAKER_ID, employee_no: "FIN001", status: "active", roles: [{ role_code: "finance" }] },
+      { id: REVIEWER_ID, employee_no: "MGR001", status: "active", roles: [{ role_code: "manager" }] },
+    ],
     invoice: {
       linked_reimbursement_id: REIMBURSEMENT_ID,
       status: "bound",
@@ -421,6 +425,9 @@ function buildPrisma(options = {}) {
     auditLog: {
       create: vi.fn(async () => ({ id: "audit-1" })),
     },
+    employee: {
+      findMany: vi.fn(async () => state.employees.map((employee) => ({ ...employee }))),
+    },
     $queryRaw: vi.fn(async () => [{ id: BATCH_ID }]),
   };
 
@@ -657,6 +664,33 @@ describe("payment batch reimbursement routes", () => {
 
     expect(response.statusCode).toBe(409);
     expect(response.json().error.details.review).toBe("maker_checker_conflict");
+    expect(createNotificationsWithRecordsMock).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
+    expect(flushNotificationDispatchTasksMock).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
+
+    await app.close();
+  });
+
+  it("rejects repeated payment review without creating another responsibility notification", async () => {
+    const { app } = await buildApp({
+      actor: {
+        id: REVIEWER_ID,
+        department_id: "dept-1",
+        permissionCodes: ["payment.batch.review"],
+        roleCodes: ["manager"],
+      },
+    });
+
+    const response = await app.inject({
+      method: "POST",
+      url: `/api/payment-batches/${BATCH_ID}/review`,
+      headers: { authorization: "Bearer test" },
+      payload: {},
+    });
+
+    expect(response.statusCode).toBe(409);
+    expect(response.json().error.details.review).toBe("batch_not_reviewable");
+    expect(createNotificationsWithRecordsMock).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
+    expect(flushNotificationDispatchTasksMock).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
 
     await app.close();
   });
@@ -756,6 +790,9 @@ describe("payment batch reimbursement routes", () => {
   });
 
   it("allows one manager review for a high-amount batch and does not require a second reviewer", async () => {
+    createNotificationsWithRecordsMock.mockResolvedValueOnce([
+      { id: "notif-execute-1", recipient_employee_id: MAKER_ID },
+    ]);
     const { app } = await buildApp({
       actor: {
         id: REVIEWER_ID,
@@ -783,7 +820,7 @@ describe("payment batch reimbursement routes", () => {
       payload: { comment: "已核对高额付款对象和金额" },
     });
 
-    expect(response.statusCode).toBe(200);
+    expect(response.statusCode, response.body).toBe(200);
     expect(response.json().data.item).toMatchObject({
       status: "reviewed",
       highRisk: true,
@@ -794,6 +831,65 @@ describe("payment batch reimbursement routes", () => {
         reviewerPermission: "payment.batch.review",
       },
     });
+    expect(createNotificationsWithRecordsMock).toHaveBeenCalledWith(
+      expect.any(Object),
+      expect.objectContaining({
+        recipientEmployeeIds: [MAKER_ID],
+        type: "payment_batch.execution_requested",
+        targetType: "payment_batch",
+        targetId: BATCH_ID,
+      }),
+    );
+    expect(flushNotificationDispatchTasksMock).toHaveBeenCalledWith(
+      expect.objectContaining({
+        tasks: [expect.objectContaining({
+          type: "payment_batch.execution_requested",
+          targetPath: `/payment-batches?id=${BATCH_ID}`,
+        })],
+      }),
+    );
+
+    await app.close();
+  });
+
+  it("falls back to another active finance payment manager after review when the maker is unavailable", async () => {
+    const fallbackFinanceId = "dddddddd-dddd-4ddd-8ddd-dddddddddddd";
+    createNotificationsWithRecordsMock.mockResolvedValueOnce([
+      { id: "notif-execute-fallback", recipient_employee_id: fallbackFinanceId },
+    ]);
+    const { app } = await buildApp({
+      actor: {
+        id: REVIEWER_ID,
+        department_id: "dept-1",
+        permissionCodes: ["payment.batch.review"],
+        roleCodes: ["manager"],
+      },
+      batch: {
+        status: "draft",
+        reviewed_at: null,
+        reviewed_by: null,
+      },
+      employees: [
+        { id: fallbackFinanceId, employee_no: "FIN002", status: "active", roles: [{ role_code: "finance" }] },
+        { id: REVIEWER_ID, employee_no: "MGR001", status: "active", roles: [{ role_code: "manager" }] },
+      ],
+    });
+
+    const response = await app.inject({
+      method: "POST",
+      url: `/api/payment-batches/${BATCH_ID}/review`,
+      headers: { authorization: "Bearer test" },
+      payload: {},
+    });
+
+    expect(response.statusCode, response.body).toBe(200);
+    expect(createNotificationsWithRecordsMock).toHaveBeenCalledWith(
+      expect.any(Object),
+      expect.objectContaining({
+        recipientEmployeeIds: [fallbackFinanceId],
+        type: "payment_batch.execution_requested",
+      }),
+    );
 
     await app.close();
   });
@@ -898,6 +994,98 @@ describe("payment batch reimbursement routes", () => {
     await app.close();
   });
 
+  it("notifies active non-maker payment reviewers after creating a reimbursement batch", async () => {
+    createNotificationsWithRecordsMock.mockResolvedValueOnce([
+      { id: "notif-review-1", recipient_employee_id: REVIEWER_ID },
+    ]);
+    const { app, tx } = await buildApp();
+
+    const response = await app.inject({
+      method: "POST",
+      url: "/api/payment-batches",
+      headers: { authorization: "Bearer test" },
+      payload: {
+        entityType: "reimbursement",
+        name: "本周付款",
+        entityIds: [REIMBURSEMENT_ID],
+      },
+    });
+
+    expect(response.statusCode).toBe(201);
+    expect(createNotificationsWithRecordsMock).toHaveBeenCalledWith(
+      tx,
+      expect.objectContaining({
+        recipientEmployeeIds: [REVIEWER_ID],
+        type: "payment_batch.review_requested",
+        targetType: "payment_batch",
+        targetId: BATCH_ID,
+      }),
+    );
+    expect(flushNotificationDispatchTasksMock).toHaveBeenCalledWith(
+      expect.objectContaining({
+        tasks: [expect.objectContaining({
+          type: "payment_batch.review_requested",
+          targetPath: `/payment-batches?id=${BATCH_ID}`,
+        })],
+      }),
+    );
+
+    await app.close();
+  });
+
+  it("creates no payment review notification when no eligible non-maker reviewer exists", async () => {
+    const { app } = await buildApp({
+      employees: [
+        { id: ACTOR_ID, employee_no: "FIN001", status: "active", roles: [{ role_code: "finance" }] },
+      ],
+    });
+
+    const response = await app.inject({
+      method: "POST",
+      url: "/api/payment-batches",
+      headers: { authorization: "Bearer test" },
+      payload: {
+        entityType: "reimbursement",
+        name: "无人复核批次",
+        entityIds: [REIMBURSEMENT_ID],
+      },
+    });
+
+    expect(response.statusCode).toBe(201);
+    expect(createNotificationsWithRecordsMock).toHaveBeenCalledWith(
+      expect.any(Object),
+      expect.objectContaining({ recipientEmployeeIds: [] }),
+    );
+    expect(flushNotificationDispatchTasksMock).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
+
+    await app.close();
+  });
+
+  it("keeps a created batch when payment review notification delivery fails", async () => {
+    createNotificationsWithRecordsMock.mockResolvedValueOnce([
+      { id: "notif-review-failed", recipient_employee_id: REVIEWER_ID },
+    ]);
+    flushNotificationDispatchTasksMock.mockRejectedValueOnce(new Error("synthetic dispatch failure"));
+    const { app, state } = await buildApp();
+
+    const response = await app.inject({
+      method: "POST",
+      url: "/api/payment-batches",
+      headers: { authorization: "Bearer test" },
+      payload: {
+        entityType: "reimbursement",
+        name: "投递失败不回滚",
+        entityIds: [REIMBURSEMENT_ID],
+      },
+    });
+
+    expect(response.statusCode).toBe(201);
+    expect(state.batch.status).toBe("draft");
+    expect(state.batch.items).toHaveLength(1);
+
+    await app.close();
+  });
+
   it("adds a non-identifying random suffix to concurrent-style batch numbers", async () => {
     const { app, tx } = await buildApp();
     const payload = {

server/tests/unit/routes/reimbursements.detail.test.js

@@ -322,7 +322,7 @@ describe("GET /api/reimbursements/:id detail enhancements", () => {
       expect.objectContaining({ key: "submitted", state: "completed", actorName: "李四", result: "已提交" }),
       expect.objectContaining({ key: "approval_manager-task", label: "主管审批", state: "completed", actorName: "王经理", result: "通过" }),
       expect.objectContaining({ key: "approval_finance-task", label: "财务审批", state: "current", actorName: "财务专员", result: "处理中" }),
-      expect.objectContaining({ key: "payment_batch_review", state: "pending", actorName: null, detail: "待财务创建付款批次" }),
+      expect.objectContaining({ key: "payment_batch_review", state: "pending", actorName: null, detail: "待财务安排付款" }),
       expect.objectContaining({ key: "payment_and_receipt", state: "pending", actorName: null }),
     ]);
 
@@ -598,11 +598,11 @@ describe("GET /api/reimbursements/:id detail enhancements", () => {
   });
 
   it.each([
-    ["draft", "current", "pending", "待所在付款批次复核通过"],
+    ["draft", "current", "pending", "待付款复核通过后由财务登记，非审批环节"],
-    ["reviewed", "completed", "current", "所在付款批次已复核，待执行付款"],
+    ["reviewed", "completed", "current", "待财务完成付款并登记回单，非审批环节"],
-    ["executed", "completed", "completed", "付款与回单已留存"],
+    ["executed", "completed", "completed", "付款和回单已留存"],
-    ["failed", "completed", "exception", "所在付款批次执行失败，待财务重新处理"],
+    ["failed", "completed", "exception", "付款失败，待财务重新处理，非审批环节"],
-    ["cancelled", "exception", "pending", "待财务重新创建付款批次"],
+    ["cancelled", "exception", "pending", "待财务重新安排付款，非审批环节"],
   ])("maps %s payment batch without exposing a batch link to ordinary applicants", async (status, reviewState, paymentState, detail) => {
     const paymentBatchItem = {
       id: "batch-item-1",
@@ -670,7 +670,7 @@ describe("GET /api/reimbursements/:id detail enhancements", () => {
     });
     expect(response.statusCode).toBe(200);
     expect(response.json().data.processingProgress.stages[3]).toMatchObject({
-      detail: "所在付款批次待非制单人复核",
+      detail: "待非制单人复核付款",
       actorName: null,
       targetHref: "/payment-batches?id=batch-1",
     });
@@ -691,8 +691,8 @@ describe("GET /api/reimbursements/:id detail enhancements", () => {
     expect(response.json().data.processingProgress.stages[3]).toMatchObject({
       state: "current",
       actorName: null,
-      result: "待建批次",
+      result: "待安排",
-      detail: "待财务创建付款批次",
+      detail: "待财务安排付款",
     });
 
     await app.close();