PS6 修复采购提交预算预检阻断

这个提交包含在:
2026-05-12 01:30:12 +08:00
父节点 d8b2e4f954
当前提交 a8b7351a4f
共修改 3 个文件,包含 306 行新增和 3 行删除
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
ID,Title,Description,Acceptance,Test_Method,Tools,Dev_Status,Review1_Status,Regression_Status,Files,Dependencies,Notes ID,Title,Description,Acceptance,Test_Method,Tools,Dev_Status,Review1_Status,Regression_Status,Files,Dependencies,Notes
PS6-1,R6 采购提交阻断建档,记录 R6-4 采购主链路在公网提交时触发服务端 500 的事实证据,并固定本热修合同范围。,"1) `docs/trialrun/manual-trialrun-report.md` 已登记 `R6-ISSUE-003`;2) R6 小范围合同 R6-4 保持未完整通过,R6-5/R6-6 不推进;3) 本合同只处理采购提交预算预检变量缺失,不扩功能、不改远端数据、不清理 smoke 数据。","流程级验证:python3 /home/shunli/.codex/skills/plan/scripts/validate_issues_csv.py issues/2026-05-12_01-12-20-r6-purchase-submit-budget-precheck-hotfix.csv;rg -n 'R6-ISSUE-003|budgetPrecheckGate|ab69db11-87e3-48b0-8a8a-43324d1c70e5' docs/trialrun/manual-trialrun-report.md issues server/src/routes/purchaseRequests.js。",python3|rg|manual,DONE,DONE,DONE,issues/2026-05-12_01-12-20-r6-purchase-submit-budget-precheck-hotfix.csv|docs/trialrun/manual-trialrun-report.md,[],R6-4 已创建公网测试数据,采购草稿 `ab69db11-87e3-48b0-8a8a-43324d1c70e5` 停在 draft;不得清理或篡改历史数据,修复后新建或复用可解释测试单据复跑。 PS6-1,R6 采购提交阻断建档,记录 R6-4 采购主链路在公网提交时触发服务端 500 的事实证据,并固定本热修合同范围。,"1) `docs/trialrun/manual-trialrun-report.md` 已登记 `R6-ISSUE-003`;2) R6 小范围合同 R6-4 保持未完整通过,R6-5/R6-6 不推进;3) 本合同只处理采购提交预算预检变量缺失,不扩功能、不改远端数据、不清理 smoke 数据。","流程级验证:python3 /home/shunli/.codex/skills/plan/scripts/validate_issues_csv.py issues/2026-05-12_01-12-20-r6-purchase-submit-budget-precheck-hotfix.csv;rg -n 'R6-ISSUE-003|budgetPrecheckGate|ab69db11-87e3-48b0-8a8a-43324d1c70e5' docs/trialrun/manual-trialrun-report.md issues server/src/routes/purchaseRequests.js。",python3|rg|manual,DONE,DONE,DONE,issues/2026-05-12_01-12-20-r6-purchase-submit-budget-precheck-hotfix.csv|docs/trialrun/manual-trialrun-report.md,[],R6-4 已创建公网测试数据,采购草稿 `ab69db11-87e3-48b0-8a8a-43324d1c70e5` 停在 draft;不得清理或篡改历史数据,修复后新建或复用可解释测试单据复跑。
PS6-2,修复采购提交预算预检变量,在 `server/src/routes/purchaseRequests.js` 的提交路径中正确求值或传递 `budgetPrecheckGate`,避免缺预算池分支引用未定义变量。,"1) `/api/purchase-requests/:id/submit` 不再因 `budgetPrecheckGate is not defined` 返回 500;2) 保持预算预检既有语义:开启 budget_precheck 时以 authoritative precheck 为准,未开启时走 legacy fallback control mode;3) 无 Prisma migration、无 API 契约变更、无权限模型变更。","流程级验证:cd server && npm run prisma:validate;cd server && node --check src/routes/purchaseRequests.js;补充或更新采购提交测试,覆盖无预算池、预算预检开关关闭/继承、提交进入审批或返回可解释 4xx 的路径;确认不会生成 500。",node|npm,TODO,TODO,TODO,server/src/routes/purchaseRequests.js|server/tests/**,"[""PS6-1""]","回滚路径:还原本 Issue 对 `server/src/routes/purchaseRequests.js` 和测试文件的变更后重新部署;不涉及 schema 和数据回滚。" PS6-2,修复采购提交预算预检变量,在 `server/src/routes/purchaseRequests.js` 的提交路径中正确求值或传递 `budgetPrecheckGate`,避免缺预算池分支引用未定义变量。,"1) `/api/purchase-requests/:id/submit` 不再因 `budgetPrecheckGate is not defined` 返回 500;2) 保持预算预检既有语义:开启 budget_precheck 时以 authoritative precheck 为准,未开启时走 legacy fallback control mode;3) 无 Prisma migration、无 API 契约变更、无权限模型变更。","流程级验证:cd server && npm run prisma:validate;cd server && node --check src/routes/purchaseRequests.js;补充或更新采购提交测试,覆盖无预算池、预算预检开关关闭/继承、提交进入审批或返回可解释 4xx 的路径;确认不会生成 500。",node|npm,DONE,DONE,DONE,server/src/routes/purchaseRequests.js|server/tests/**,"[""PS6-1""]","DONE:已在采购提交事务中求值 `FEATURE_FLAG_KEYS.budgetPrecheck`,预算预检关闭时使用 legacy fallback control mode,开启时沿用 authoritative precheck 结果;新增 `server/tests/unit/routes/purchase.submit-budget-precheck.test.js` 覆盖无预算池、预算预检关闭且 precheck hint=block 时仍进入审批并返回 `missing_budget_pool` warning,不再 500。验证通过:`cd server && npm run prisma:validate`;`cd server && node --check src/routes/purchaseRequests.js`;`cd server && npm test -- tests/unit/routes/purchase.submit-budget-precheck.test.js tests/unit/routes/purchase.submit-side-effects.test.js`。回滚路径:还原本 Issue 对 `server/src/routes/purchaseRequests.js` 和测试文件的变更后重新部署;不涉及 schema 和数据回滚。"
PS6-3,采购主链路本地回归,复跑采购业务自动化,确认员工提交采购、经理审批、历史查看不再被预算预检变量阻断。,"1) 本地采购业务流通过;2) 若缺预算池,结果必须是可解释业务校验或正常进入审批,不允许 500;3) 不要求新增预算、ERP、AI、完整差旅或复杂 BPM。","流程级验证:BUSINESS_FLOW_GROUPS=procurement bash scripts/qa/run-business-flow-gates.sh local;如该脚本不可用,则用现有 Playwright/接口脚本登录 `SMOKE002` 创建采购 -> 提交 -> `SMOKE101` 审批 -> 查询历史,并记录替代命令。",bash|playwright,TODO,TODO,TODO,scripts/qa/*|client/tests/e2e/*,"[""PS6-2""]","若本地隔离环境缺采购基础资料,可使用测试 seed 或脚本受控创建测试成本中心、供应商、法体和采购类别;不得改生产数据。" PS6-3,采购主链路本地回归,复跑采购业务自动化,确认员工提交采购、经理审批、历史查看不再被预算预检变量阻断。,"1) 本地采购业务流通过;2) 若缺预算池,结果必须是可解释业务校验或正常进入审批,不允许 500;3) 不要求新增预算、ERP、AI、完整差旅或复杂 BPM。","流程级验证:BUSINESS_FLOW_GROUPS=procurement bash scripts/qa/run-business-flow-gates.sh local;如该脚本不可用,则用现有 Playwright/接口脚本登录 `SMOKE002` 创建采购 -> 提交 -> `SMOKE101` 审批 -> 查询历史,并记录替代命令。",bash|playwright,DONE,DONE,DONE,scripts/qa/*|client/tests/e2e/*,"[""PS6-2""]","DONE:`BUSINESS_FLOW_GROUPS=procurement bash scripts/qa/run-business-flow-gates.sh local` 通过,`procurement-flow.spec.ts` 1 passed,报告 `artifacts/qa-flow/business-flow-20260512-012612/summary.txt`;本地链路覆盖员工提单、经理审批、财务归档,不新增预算、ERP、AI、完整差旅或复杂 BPM。"
PS6-4,部署与公网复检,本地验证通过后受控部署到 `https://oa.hyinda.com`,复检公网健康和基础 smoke。,"1) `bash deploy/trialrun/deploy.sh` 成功,不覆盖远端 `.env`;2) `/ready` 正常;3) public bundle 扫描 findings=0;4) live smoke readiness 通过;5) 企业微信个人应用消息通道仍为 `wecom_app_message enabled=true`。","流程级验证:bash deploy/trialrun/deploy.sh;curl -fsS https://oa.hyinda.com/ready;LIVE_SMOKE_BASE_URL=https://oa.hyinda.com bash scripts/qa/run-live-smoke-readiness.sh;只读确认通知渠道和公网运行文件哈希。",bash|curl|ssh,TODO,TODO,TODO,deploy/trialrun/*|scripts/qa/*,"[""PS6-3""]","若部署失败,停止并记录错误;不手工修远端代码、不改 `.env`、不继续 R6。" PS6-4,部署与公网复检,本地验证通过后受控部署到 `https://oa.hyinda.com`,复检公网健康和基础 smoke。,"1) `bash deploy/trialrun/deploy.sh` 成功,不覆盖远端 `.env`;2) `/ready` 正常;3) public bundle 扫描 findings=0;4) live smoke readiness 通过;5) 企业微信个人应用消息通道仍为 `wecom_app_message enabled=true`。","流程级验证:bash deploy/trialrun/deploy.sh;curl -fsS https://oa.hyinda.com/ready;LIVE_SMOKE_BASE_URL=https://oa.hyinda.com bash scripts/qa/run-live-smoke-readiness.sh;只读确认通知渠道和公网运行文件哈希。",bash|curl|ssh,TODO,TODO,TODO,deploy/trialrun/*|scripts/qa/*,"[""PS6-3""]","若部署失败,停止并记录错误;不手工修远端代码、不改 `.env`、不继续 R6。"
PS6-5,恢复 R6-4 采购复跑与状态回填,热修部署后恢复 R6-4 的采购路径复跑,完成采购提交、审批和历史查看后再判断是否进入 R6-5。,"1) 采购从草稿提交进入审批或可解释业务状态;2) `SMOKE101` 可处理采购待办;3) 采购历史与审批中心一致;4) `docs/trialrun/manual-trialrun-report.md` 和 R6 合同已回填;5) 主 R6 仍不标 DONE,直到 R6-5/R6-6 完成。","流程级验证:公网 `SMOKE002` 创建/提交采购 -> `SMOKE101` 审批 -> 员工/管理员查看采购历史和审批日志 -> 记录到 R6 流程矩阵;必要时补企业微信消息审计。",manual|playwright|curl,TODO,TODO,TODO,docs/trialrun/manual-trialrun-report.md|issues/2026-05-11_10-23-41-r6-small-trialrun-prep.csv,"[""PS6-4""]","复跑通过后可把 R6-4 Regression_Status 置为 DONE,并进入 R6-5 每日收口;若仍失败,保持 R6-ISSUE-003 open 并暂停 R6。" PS6-5,恢复 R6-4 采购复跑与状态回填,热修部署后恢复 R6-4 的采购路径复跑,完成采购提交、审批和历史查看后再判断是否进入 R6-5。,"1) 采购从草稿提交进入审批或可解释业务状态;2) `SMOKE101` 可处理采购待办;3) 采购历史与审批中心一致;4) `docs/trialrun/manual-trialrun-report.md` 和 R6 合同已回填;5) 主 R6 仍不标 DONE,直到 R6-5/R6-6 完成。","流程级验证:公网 `SMOKE002` 创建/提交采购 -> `SMOKE101` 审批 -> 员工/管理员查看采购历史和审批日志 -> 记录到 R6 流程矩阵;必要时补企业微信消息审计。",manual|playwright|curl,TODO,TODO,TODO,docs/trialrun/manual-trialrun-report.md|issues/2026-05-11_10-23-41-r6-small-trialrun-prep.csv,"[""PS6-4""]","复跑通过后可把 R6-4 Regression_Status 置为 DONE,并进入 R6-5 每日收口;若仍失败,保持 R6-ISSUE-003 open 并暂停 R6。"
1 ID Title Description Acceptance Test_Method Tools Dev_Status Review1_Status Regression_Status Files Dependencies Notes
2 PS6-1 R6 采购提交阻断建档 记录 R6-4 采购主链路在公网提交时触发服务端 500 的事实证据,并固定本热修合同范围。 1) `docs/trialrun/manual-trialrun-report.md` 已登记 `R6-ISSUE-003`;2) R6 小范围合同 R6-4 保持未完整通过,R6-5/R6-6 不推进;3) 本合同只处理采购提交预算预检变量缺失,不扩功能、不改远端数据、不清理 smoke 数据。 流程级验证:python3 /home/shunli/.codex/skills/plan/scripts/validate_issues_csv.py issues/2026-05-12_01-12-20-r6-purchase-submit-budget-precheck-hotfix.csv;rg -n 'R6-ISSUE-003|budgetPrecheckGate|ab69db11-87e3-48b0-8a8a-43324d1c70e5' docs/trialrun/manual-trialrun-report.md issues server/src/routes/purchaseRequests.js。 python3|rg|manual DONE DONE DONE issues/2026-05-12_01-12-20-r6-purchase-submit-budget-precheck-hotfix.csv|docs/trialrun/manual-trialrun-report.md [] R6-4 已创建公网测试数据,采购草稿 `ab69db11-87e3-48b0-8a8a-43324d1c70e5` 停在 draft;不得清理或篡改历史数据,修复后新建或复用可解释测试单据复跑。
3 PS6-2 修复采购提交预算预检变量 在 `server/src/routes/purchaseRequests.js` 的提交路径中正确求值或传递 `budgetPrecheckGate`,避免缺预算池分支引用未定义变量。 1) `/api/purchase-requests/:id/submit` 不再因 `budgetPrecheckGate is not defined` 返回 500;2) 保持预算预检既有语义:开启 budget_precheck 时以 authoritative precheck 为准,未开启时走 legacy fallback control mode;3) 无 Prisma migration、无 API 契约变更、无权限模型变更。 流程级验证:cd server && npm run prisma:validate;cd server && node --check src/routes/purchaseRequests.js;补充或更新采购提交测试,覆盖无预算池、预算预检开关关闭/继承、提交进入审批或返回可解释 4xx 的路径;确认不会生成 500。 node|npm TODO DONE TODO DONE TODO DONE server/src/routes/purchaseRequests.js|server/tests/** ["PS6-1"] 回滚路径:还原本 Issue 对 `server/src/routes/purchaseRequests.js` 和测试文件的变更后重新部署;不涉及 schema 和数据回滚。 DONE:已在采购提交事务中求值 `FEATURE_FLAG_KEYS.budgetPrecheck`,预算预检关闭时使用 legacy fallback control mode,开启时沿用 authoritative precheck 结果;新增 `server/tests/unit/routes/purchase.submit-budget-precheck.test.js` 覆盖无预算池、预算预检关闭且 precheck hint=block 时仍进入审批并返回 `missing_budget_pool` warning,不再 500。验证通过:`cd server && npm run prisma:validate`;`cd server && node --check src/routes/purchaseRequests.js`;`cd server && npm test -- tests/unit/routes/purchase.submit-budget-precheck.test.js tests/unit/routes/purchase.submit-side-effects.test.js`。回滚路径:还原本 Issue 对 `server/src/routes/purchaseRequests.js` 和测试文件的变更后重新部署;不涉及 schema 和数据回滚。
4 PS6-3 采购主链路本地回归 复跑采购业务自动化,确认员工提交采购、经理审批、历史查看不再被预算预检变量阻断。 1) 本地采购业务流通过;2) 若缺预算池,结果必须是可解释业务校验或正常进入审批,不允许 500;3) 不要求新增预算、ERP、AI、完整差旅或复杂 BPM。 流程级验证:BUSINESS_FLOW_GROUPS=procurement bash scripts/qa/run-business-flow-gates.sh local;如该脚本不可用,则用现有 Playwright/接口脚本登录 `SMOKE002` 创建采购 -> 提交 -> `SMOKE101` 审批 -> 查询历史,并记录替代命令。 bash|playwright TODO DONE TODO DONE TODO DONE scripts/qa/*|client/tests/e2e/* ["PS6-2"] 若本地隔离环境缺采购基础资料,可使用测试 seed 或脚本受控创建测试成本中心、供应商、法体和采购类别;不得改生产数据。 DONE:`BUSINESS_FLOW_GROUPS=procurement bash scripts/qa/run-business-flow-gates.sh local` 通过,`procurement-flow.spec.ts` 1 passed,报告 `artifacts/qa-flow/business-flow-20260512-012612/summary.txt`;本地链路覆盖员工提单、经理审批、财务归档,不新增预算、ERP、AI、完整差旅或复杂 BPM。
5 PS6-4 部署与公网复检 本地验证通过后受控部署到 `https://oa.hyinda.com`,复检公网健康和基础 smoke。 1) `bash deploy/trialrun/deploy.sh` 成功,不覆盖远端 `.env`;2) `/ready` 正常;3) public bundle 扫描 findings=0;4) live smoke readiness 通过;5) 企业微信个人应用消息通道仍为 `wecom_app_message enabled=true`。 流程级验证:bash deploy/trialrun/deploy.sh;curl -fsS https://oa.hyinda.com/ready;LIVE_SMOKE_BASE_URL=https://oa.hyinda.com bash scripts/qa/run-live-smoke-readiness.sh;只读确认通知渠道和公网运行文件哈希。 bash|curl|ssh TODO TODO TODO deploy/trialrun/*|scripts/qa/* ["PS6-3"] 若部署失败,停止并记录错误;不手工修远端代码、不改 `.env`、不继续 R6。
6 PS6-5 恢复 R6-4 采购复跑与状态回填 热修部署后恢复 R6-4 的采购路径复跑,完成采购提交、审批和历史查看后再判断是否进入 R6-5。 1) 采购从草稿提交进入审批或可解释业务状态;2) `SMOKE101` 可处理采购待办;3) 采购历史与审批中心一致;4) `docs/trialrun/manual-trialrun-report.md` 和 R6 合同已回填;5) 主 R6 仍不标 DONE,直到 R6-5/R6-6 完成。 流程级验证:公网 `SMOKE002` 创建/提交采购 -> `SMOKE101` 审批 -> 员工/管理员查看采购历史和审批日志 -> 记录到 R6 流程矩阵;必要时补企业微信消息审计。 manual|playwright|curl TODO TODO TODO docs/trialrun/manual-trialrun-report.md|issues/2026-05-11_10-23-41-r6-small-trialrun-prep.csv ["PS6-4"] 复跑通过后可把 R6-4 Regression_Status 置为 DONE,并进入 R6-5 每日收口;若仍失败,保持 R6-ISSUE-003 open 并暂停 R6。
+13 -1
查看文件
@@ -1612,7 +1612,19 @@ async function purchaseRequestRoutes(fastify) {
} }
const warnings = []; const warnings = [];
const budgetControlMode = authoritativePrecheck?.budgetHint?.controlMode ?? normalizeBudgetControlMode(fastify.config); const budgetPrecheckGate = await evaluateFeatureFlag({
prisma: tx,
config: fastify.config,
flagKey: FEATURE_FLAG_KEYS.budgetPrecheck,
departmentId: purchaseRequest.department_id ?? request.employee.department_id ?? null,
strictDepartment: false,
});
const fallbackBudgetControlMode = normalizeBudgetControlMode(fastify.config);
const budgetControlMode = budgetPrecheckGate.enabled
? authoritativePrecheck.matchedBudgetControlRule?.controlMode
?? authoritativePrecheck?.budgetHint?.controlMode
?? fallbackBudgetControlMode
: fallbackBudgetControlMode;
if (!selectedBudgetPoolId) { if (!selectedBudgetPoolId) {
if (!budgetPrecheckGate.enabled && budgetControlMode === "block") { if (!budgetPrecheckGate.enabled && budgetControlMode === "block") {
throw buildValidationError({ budget: "missing_budget_pool" }, 409); throw buildValidationError({ budget: "missing_budget_pool" }, 409);
@@ -0,0 +1,291 @@
const Fastify = require("fastify");
const { AppError } = require("../../../src/utils/AppError");
const budgetPool = require("../../../src/services/budgetPool");
const feeControl = require("../../../src/services/feeControl");
const notifications = require("../../../src/services/notifications");
const resolveApplicableBudgetPoolByContextMock = vi.fn();
const resolveEntityPrecheckMock = vi.fn();
const createRiskFlagsFromPrecheckMock = vi.fn();
const resolveRecipientsForAssigneeMock = vi.fn();
const originalResolveApplicableBudgetPoolByContext = budgetPool.resolveApplicableBudgetPoolByContext;
const originalResolveEntityPrecheck = feeControl.resolveEntityPrecheck;
const originalCreateRiskFlagsFromPrecheck = feeControl.createRiskFlagsFromPrecheck;
const originalResolveRecipientsForAssignee = notifications.resolveRecipientsForAssignee;
budgetPool.resolveApplicableBudgetPoolByContext = resolveApplicableBudgetPoolByContextMock;
feeControl.resolveEntityPrecheck = resolveEntityPrecheckMock;
feeControl.createRiskFlagsFromPrecheck = createRiskFlagsFromPrecheckMock;
notifications.resolveRecipientsForAssignee = resolveRecipientsForAssigneeMock;
delete require.cache[require.resolve("../../../src/routes/purchaseRequests")];
const purchaseRequestRoutes = require("../../../src/routes/purchaseRequests");
const PURCHASE_REQUEST_ID = "11111111-1111-4111-8111-111111111111";
const EMPLOYEE_ID = "22222222-2222-4222-8222-222222222222";
const DEPARTMENT_ID = "33333333-3333-4333-8333-333333333333";
const LEGAL_ENTITY_ID = "44444444-4444-4444-8444-444444444444";
const COST_CENTER_ID = "55555555-5555-4555-8555-555555555555";
const SUPPLIER_ID = "66666666-6666-4666-8666-666666666666";
const DOCUMENT_CATEGORY_ID = "77777777-7777-4777-8777-777777777777";
function buildPrecheck(overrides = {}) {
return {
entityType: "purchase_request",
entityId: PURCHASE_REQUEST_ID,
decision: "pass",
matchedBudgetControlRule: null,
budgetHint: null,
standardChecks: [],
warnings: [],
blockingReasons: [],
riskFlags: [],
nextActions: ["可直接提交"],
...overrides,
};
}
async function buildApp(options = {}) {
const app = Fastify();
const actor = {
id: EMPLOYEE_ID,
department_id: DEPARTMENT_ID,
roleCodes: [],
permissionCodes: ["procurement.submit"],
};
const purchaseRequest = {
id: PURCHASE_REQUEST_ID,
applicant_id: EMPLOYEE_ID,
submitter_id: null,
department_id: DEPARTMENT_ID,
legal_entity_id: LEGAL_ENTITY_ID,
cost_center_id: COST_CENTER_ID,
supplier_id: SUPPLIER_ID,
document_category_id: DOCUMENT_CATEGORY_ID,
budget_pool_id: null,
request_no: null,
title: "R6 采购提交热修测试",
reason: null,
currency_code: "CNY",
total_amount: "99.00",
expected_delivery_date: null,
status: "draft",
created_at: new Date("2026-05-12T00:00:00.000Z"),
updated_at: new Date("2026-05-12T00:00:00.000Z"),
items: [{ id: "item-1" }],
applicant: { id: EMPLOYEE_ID, name: "申请人" },
document_category: {
id: DOCUMENT_CATEGORY_ID,
code: "PR_STANDARD",
name: "标准采购申请",
entity_type: "purchase_request",
enabled: true,
archived_at: null,
},
};
const state = {
workflowInstanceCreatePayload: null,
};
const tx = {
$queryRaw: vi.fn(async () => [purchaseRequest]),
legalEntity: {
findUnique: vi.fn(async () => ({
id: LEGAL_ENTITY_ID,
code: "LE",
name: "测试法体",
enabled: true,
archived_at: null,
})),
},
costCenter: {
findUnique: vi.fn(async () => ({
id: COST_CENTER_ID,
code: "CC",
name: "测试成本中心",
legal_entity_id: LEGAL_ENTITY_ID,
enabled: true,
archived_at: null,
})),
},
supplier: {
findUnique: vi.fn(async () => ({
id: SUPPLIER_ID,
code: "SUP",
name: "测试供应商",
legal_entity_id: LEGAL_ENTITY_ID,
enabled: true,
archived_at: null,
})),
},
documentCategory: {
findUnique: vi.fn(async () => purchaseRequest.document_category),
findFirst: vi.fn(async () => purchaseRequest.document_category),
},
documentSequence: {
findUnique: vi.fn(async () => null),
upsert: vi.fn(async () => ({
document_type: "purchase_request",
prefix: "CG",
date_format: "YYYYMMDD",
separator: "-",
number_length: 4,
reset_period: "yearly",
current_number: 1,
last_reset_date: null,
updated_at: new Date("2026-05-12T00:00:00.000Z"),
updated_by: EMPLOYEE_ID,
})),
},
purchaseRequestItem: {
aggregate: vi.fn(async () => ({
_sum: { line_amount: "99.00" },
})),
},
purchaseRequest: {
findUnique: vi.fn(async () => purchaseRequest),
update: vi.fn(async ({ data }) => ({
...purchaseRequest,
...data,
})),
},
workflowInstance: {
create: vi.fn(async ({ data }) => {
state.workflowInstanceCreatePayload = data;
return { id: "88888888-8888-4888-8888-888888888888" };
}),
},
workflowTask: {
create: vi.fn(async () => ({
id: "99999999-9999-4999-8999-999999999999",
assignee_id: null,
assignee_role: "manager",
})),
},
workflowHistory: {
create: vi.fn(async () => ({ id: "history-1" })),
},
auditLog: {
create: vi.fn(async () => ({ id: "audit-1" })),
},
};
const prisma = {
$transaction: vi.fn(async (callback) => callback(tx)),
auditLog: {
create: vi.fn(async () => ({ id: "audit-outer" })),
},
purchaseRequest: {
findUnique: vi.fn(async () => purchaseRequest),
},
workflowDefinition: {
findFirst: vi.fn(async () => ({
id: "aaaaaaaa-aaaa-4aaa-8aaa-aaaaaaaaaaaa",
definition_json: {
steps: [
{
id: "approval_1_manager",
name: "主管审批",
type: "approval",
assignee_rule: { type: "role", value: "manager" },
},
],
},
})),
},
};
app.decorate("prisma", prisma);
app.decorate("config", {
appTimezone: "Asia/Shanghai",
budgetControlMode: options.budgetControlMode ?? "warn",
budgetPrecheckEnabled: options.budgetPrecheckEnabled ?? false,
cutoverConsoleEnabled: false,
imNotifierEnabled: false,
emailEnabled: false,
});
app.decorate("hasPermission", (employee, permissionCode) => {
const permissionCodes = employee?.permissionCodes ?? [];
return permissionCodes.includes("*") || permissionCodes.includes(permissionCode);
});
app.decorate("requirePermission", (permissionCode) => async (request) => {
request.employee = actor;
if (!app.hasPermission(actor, permissionCode)) {
throw new AppError({
code: "PERM_001",
message: "无权限",
statusCode: 403,
});
}
});
app.setErrorHandler((error, request, reply) => {
reply.status(error.statusCode || 500).send({
requestId: request.id,
error: {
code: error.code || "SYS_001",
message: error.message,
details: error.details ?? null,
},
});
});
await app.register(purchaseRequestRoutes, { prefix: "/api" });
return { app, prisma, tx, state };
}
describe("purchase request submit budget precheck gate", () => {
afterAll(() => {
budgetPool.resolveApplicableBudgetPoolByContext = originalResolveApplicableBudgetPoolByContext;
feeControl.resolveEntityPrecheck = originalResolveEntityPrecheck;
feeControl.createRiskFlagsFromPrecheck = originalCreateRiskFlagsFromPrecheck;
notifications.resolveRecipientsForAssignee = originalResolveRecipientsForAssignee;
});
beforeEach(() => {
vi.clearAllMocks();
resolveApplicableBudgetPoolByContextMock.mockResolvedValue(null);
createRiskFlagsFromPrecheckMock.mockResolvedValue([]);
resolveRecipientsForAssigneeMock.mockResolvedValue([]);
});
it("does not 500 when no budget pool exists and budget precheck is disabled", async () => {
resolveEntityPrecheckMock.mockResolvedValue(
buildPrecheck({
budgetHint: {
controlMode: "block",
},
}),
);
const { app, state } = await buildApp({
budgetControlMode: "warn",
budgetPrecheckEnabled: false,
});
const response = await app.inject({
method: "POST",
url: `/api/purchase-requests/${PURCHASE_REQUEST_ID}/submit`,
});
expect(response.statusCode).toBe(200);
expect(response.json().data).toEqual(
expect.objectContaining({
purchaseRequestId: PURCHASE_REQUEST_ID,
status: "reviewing",
budgetPoolId: null,
warnings: ["missing_budget_pool"],
}),
);
expect(state.workflowInstanceCreatePayload).toEqual(
expect.objectContaining({
entity_type: "purchase_request",
entity_id: PURCHASE_REQUEST_ID,
}),
);
await app.close();
});
});